"Starry Night"

The title is "Starry Night". Gorelick supplied this photo to NG. This is the original, once again. Look closely and you will see the geometric forms in the forehead.
hrallen

A Closer Look

I had to do some modifications, a little blurring, to show the forehead in a detailed zoom. You can see the geometric formations quite clearly.
hrallen

By Design

Although it is hard for me not to speculate on the face, I do wish to make the following observations. I made reference to a "city" in the forehead of the "Face". I wish to draw your attention to this area. Looking carefully you will see geometric forms scattered about the area. Now look to the areas outside the "Face" and you will see an "ocean" of natural formations, consistent with what you would expect to see in any non populated area of earth, the moon, or any other planet that we have seen thus far. But in the "Face" the opposite is the norm rather than the exception. I would expect that if Gorelick had intended this as some sort of an hoax, he would have concentrated on the "Face" and slipped it into the final developed film. But upon closer examination, how would he have managed to duplicate such an elaborate scene located in the head of the "Face"? The fact that the "Face" alone would generate much commotion seems to have been enough for one to generate. Hence, it is still my position that this is in no way a "Hoax" perpetrated upon us. Gorleick would have much to loose if this were the case.
By Design rather than of natural formation... The evidence is all around this one image. The enlarged images I have supplied are from the NG printed photograph. You can see the ink dots all through the images. But that does not cause geometric shapes to be formed. In fact, if you look closely at the original photo supplied by Gorelick, you can see them there as well. I chose the NG photo for enlargement because of the clarity of the "Face".
There is much yet to be discovered within the "Face". But one thing stands strong through this. The "FACE" is real and the formations within the head are real.

hrallen

Final Thoughts

Some final thoughts. There is much I could say about this image. However, I do not wish to speculate on what it really is. My wish is that someone would examine this and point out the obvious, that is is very real. As time goes on I will comment on this. In the meantime, I hope that you will find this interesting and, just like me, demand to know what this really is from NASA...
hrallen

Reverse Image.

One of the things I did was to reverse this image. I wanted to see if there were any differences without all of the clutter. What you will see first is that the face does not change. Only the negative stands out. However, the "star" shaped image in the forehead area screams out to be seen. I am limited in what I can do with my equipment and I suspect that it will take experts in the field to fully determine what is in this photograph. I wanted to bring you what I could to show that this could not be explained away by the "experts"

hrallen

Why This Could Not Be a Hoax

The reason this could not be a hoax is that there is to much detail in the photograph. I wish to draw your attention to the forehead of the image. As in the images of Cydonia already provided by NASA, there are
artifacts within the image that appear to be of design. Looking closely in the forehead area, you will see several images that appear to be buildings. There is the largest of them all, the star shaped or pyramid shaped object just above the left eye. I have zoomed several times upon this area and there appears to be a city within the top of the head.
I could not imagine Gorelick devising such imagery within this "Face" to convince "us" that is is real. Especially in light of the fact that no one has of yet posted this anywhere.

What follows are my interpretations
of what "I" see in the photograph. The "Face" has all the features of human recognition. There is a neck, jaw line, nose, eyes, forehead, and ear.

Looking at the eyes, you will notice four distinct points. One on the left eye, as you face it, and three in the right eye. I believe that the eyes are looking out towards the sun. Represented in the left eye, the Sun. In the right eye, the three closet planets, Mercury, Venus and finally the Earth. I have given so much time looking at this image that I have come to several conclusions as to what the "Face" really is. Looking at the head, I see a headdress similar to that of the ones worn by the Egyptians..
Then what is this really? Is this a designed artifact built to be discovered after the demise of the planet Mars? Perhaps. I believe it is very real and that many questions have to be answered as to the nature of this photo.
Why is it in NG? Perhaps it is time for the people of the world to know that there once was life outside our own world. Perhaps Gorelick found an opportunity to expose a secret that he could no longer contain.
Will this be another explained away photo by NASA? Only time will tell. But one thing is for certain, no one can argue it's existence in National Geographic...

IS NOEL GORELICK TO BE BELIEVED

If we assume that Gorelick is not to be believed, then what motive would he have to perpetrate such an elaborate hoax? More importantly, to whom is it that he is trying to commit this act? Why would Gorelick jeopardize his position with the space administration and ASU? What I find compelling is that there is no real reason for him not to provide this picture for NG. Could it be that Gorelick simply forgot that it was in his archives? Or did he really know that it was there and wanted us to find it? Perhaps the real reason is never to be known unless Gorelick decides to make a statement about it.
I have enlarged this photo several times. There is just to much there to be considered coincidence...
Themis took this photo using special imaging. It is as if it were looking for "hot spots". What it photographed was this image... There is not controversy here. The image appears as it was taken. It is there and very real. I will point out specifics next.